1 Introduction

Pathogen-mosquito interactions are central to the transmission dynamics of many vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, and Zika. These interactions are complex and can be influenced by various factors such as the genetics of the vector, the pathogen, and environmental conditions. Mosquitoes serve as vectors, carrying pathogens between hosts, with these interactions often determining transmission success. Studies show that factors like mosquito immunity, microbiota, and even co-infection with other pathogens can modulate transmission dynamics and alter the efficiency of pathogen spread (Altinli et al., 2021; Boissière et al., 2012).

Understanding the transmission dynamics between pathogens and mosquitoes is critical for developing effective control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases. Transmission dynamics encompass the biological interactions between the vector, the pathogen, and the host, as well as external factors such as temperature, humidity, and land use. These dynamics dictate how efficiently pathogens spread, and thus, understanding them can inform public health interventions and modeling efforts for disease control (Ciota and Kramer, 2013; Smith et al., 2014).

This study provides an in-depth analysis of the current understanding of pathogen-mosquito interactions and their transmission dynamics, exploring the genetic, environmental, and ecological factors that influence these interactions., discussing how these insights can be applied to improve control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases, special attention is given to recent developments of mosquito microbiota, pathogen co-infections, and the influence of environmental factors on transmission efficiency.

2 Biology of Mosquito Vectors

2.1 Major mosquito species involved in pathogen transmission

Mosquitoes from several genera, including Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex, are responsible for transmitting a wide range of pathogens such as malaria, dengue, Zika, and West Nile virus. Anopheles mosquitoes are well known for transmitting malaria, particularly species like Anopheles gambiae. Aedes aegypti is the primary vector for dengue and Zika viruses, while Culex species, such as Culex pipiens, are the main vectors for West Nile virus and other flaviviruses. These mosquitoes vary in their geographic distribution, host preference, and capacity to transmit pathogens, making them key players in global public health concerns (Nagaki et al., 2020; Hoyos et al., 2021).

2.2 Life cycle and ecological adaptations

Mosquitoes go through four stages in their life cycle: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The adult stage is when mosquitoes become vectors of diseases. Mosquitoes like Aedes aegypti have adapted to urban environments, laying eggs in small containers of stagnant water. Other species, such as Anopheles gambiae, prefer rural or forested habitats where there are larger bodies of water. These species also exhibit ecological adaptations like high reproductive capacity and tolerance to different environmental conditions, allowing them to thrive in varied settings.

2.3 Feeding behavior and host preference

Feeding behavior in mosquitoes is essential for their role as vectors. Most disease-transmitting mosquitoes are hematophagous, requiring a blood meal for egg production. Species like Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae exhibit strong preferences for human blood, which increases the risk of pathogen transmission to humans. Other species, such as Culex pipiens, are more opportunistic and feed on a wider range of hosts, including birds and mammals. Host selection is influenced by factors like host availability, olfactory cues, and environmental conditions (Ruiz-López, 2020; Yan et al., 2021).

3 Pathogens Transmitted by Mosquitoes

3.1 Viruses (e.g., Dengue, Zika, West Nile)

Mosquitoes are vectors of several significant arboviruses, including dengue, Zika, and West Nile viruses, which pose global health challenges. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are the primary vectors for both dengue and Zika viruses. These mosquitoes thrive in tropical and subtropical regions and have adapted to urban environments, making them key players in the transmission of these viruses (Gao et al., 2019). West Nile virus, transmitted mainly by Culex mosquitoes, causes outbreaks in both humans and animals, particularly in temperate regions. The interaction between mosquito microbiota and these viruses can influence transmission dynamics, either enhancing or reducing the vector’s competence to spread these pathogens (Chandler et al., 2015; Hegde et al., 2015).

3.2 Parasites (e.g., Malaria, Filariasis)

Malaria, caused by Plasmodium parasites, is transmitted primarily by Anopheles mosquitoes. This parasite undergoes a complex life cycle within the mosquito, where it develops before being transmitted to humans. Filariasis, particularly lymphatic filariasis, is caused by parasitic nematodes like Wuchereria bancrofti and transmitted by several mosquito species, including Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles. Filariasis is endemic in tropical regions and leads to severe deformities such as elephantiasis (Simões et al., 2018).

3.3 Bacteria and other microorganisms

Mosquitoes can also harbor and transmit bacteria and other microorganisms, influencing their ability to spread viral and parasitic diseases. For example, Wolbachia bacteria, commonly found in mosquitoes, have been shown to inhibit the transmission of dengue and malaria parasites (Cirimotich et al., 2011). Wolbachia manipulates the mosquito’s immune system, reducing the vector’s capacity to harbor these pathogens. Other microorganisms, such as fungi and viruses specific to mosquitoes, also shape their vector competence by altering their physiology and interactions with transmitted pathogens (Heu and Gendrin, 2018; Altinli et al., 2021).

4 Mechanisms of Pathogen Acquisition and Transmission

4.1 Mosquito-pathogen molecular interactions

The interaction between mosquitoes and the pathogens they transmit involves a complex interplay of molecular mechanisms. Arboviruses, such as dengue and chikungunya, must first infect the mosquito midgut, where they face immune responses like the activation of the mosquito's RNA interference (RNAi) pathways and innate immunity. In Aedes aegypti, certain arboviruses can escape these defenses, allowing them to spread from the midgut to other tissues, including the salivary glands, which are essential for transmission to humans during a blood meal (Figure 1) (Alonso-Palomares et al., 2019). Furthermore, the mosquito microbiota also influences pathogen interactions by either enhancing or suppressing the replication of viruses and parasites (Bhowmik et al., 2023).

Figure 1 Transmission of different arbovirus by mosquitoes (Adopted from Alonso-Palomares et al., 2019)

4.2 Barriers to pathogen transmission in mosquitoes

Several anatomical and physiological barriers in mosquitoes prevent or reduce pathogen transmission. These include the midgut infection barrier, midgut escape barrier, and salivary gland infection barrier. For instance, some mosquito species, such as Culex tarsalis, exhibit a midgut escape barrier that prevents the virus from disseminating beyond the gut. The ability of a pathogen to overcome these barriers often dictates the mosquito’s vector competence. For arboviruses like chikungunya, selective pressures favor viruses with traits that enhance their ability to bypass these barriers, such as faster replication rates, which allow them to cross the midgut barrier and invade the salivary glands more efficiently (Merwaiss et al., 2020).

4.3 Factors influencing transmission efficiency

Several factors influence the efficiency of pathogen transmission by mosquitoes, including environmental conditions, mosquito genetics, and pathogen characteristics. Temperature plays a crucial role in modulating the transmission of viruses like Zika, with cooler temperatures reducing the replication rate of the virus in the mosquito midgut, thus limiting transmission efficiency (Ferreira et al., 2020). The presence of specific microbiota in the mosquito gut can also affect transmission efficiency. For example, certain bacterial species enhance or inhibit the ability of pathogens like Plasmodium or dengue virus to establish infections within the mosquito (Heu and Gendrin, 2018).

5 Environmental and Genetic Factors Influencing Transmission

5.1 Impact of climate and environmental changes

Climate and environmental changes significantly influence the distribution and transmission dynamics of mosquito-borne diseases. Factors such as rising temperatures and altered precipitation patterns can expand the geographical range of mosquito vectors, leading to increased risks of outbreaks in previously unaffected regions. For example, warming temperatures favor the survival and reproductive rates of mosquitoes like Aedes aegypti and Culex species, which transmit diseases such as dengue, Zika, and West Nile virus (Yeh et al., 2020; Couper et al., 2021). Climate variability, particularly extreme weather events, also influences mosquito breeding habitats, creating favorable conditions for pathogen transmission in new regions (Elbers et al., 2015).

5.2 Genetic variability in mosquitoes and pathogens

Genetic variability in mosquitoes plays a crucial role in their capacity to transmit pathogens. Mosquito populations often exhibit significant genetic diversity, which can influence traits such as vector competence, insecticide resistance, and adaptation to local environmental conditions (Fu, 2024). For example, invasive populations of Aedes albopictus in France have shown reduced genetic diversity compared to their native counterparts in Vietnam, which may impact their ability to adapt to new environments and pathogens (Minard et al., 2015). Similarly, genetic diversity in pathogens like the dengue virus allows for the emergence of new strains, complicating efforts to control transmission (Suesdek, 2019).

5.3 Role of microbiota in modulating vector competence

The microbiota of mosquitoes, particularly symbiotic bacteria like Wolbachia, plays a significant role in modulating vector competence. Certain microbial communities can either enhance or suppress the ability of mosquitoes to transmit pathogens. Wolbachia, for example, has been shown to reduce the replication of viruses such as dengue and Zika, thereby reducing the mosquitoes' ability to transmit these pathogens. Environmental factors such as temperature can also affect the composition and function of mosquito microbiota, with higher temperatures reducing the abundance of Wolbachia and increasing susceptibility to viruses like West Nile virus (Duguma et al., 2017; Tokash-Peters et al., 2022).

6 Control Strategies Targeting Pathogen-Mosquito Interactions

6.1 Genetic modification and sterile insect techniques

Genetic modification and Sterile Insect Techniques (SIT) have emerged as effective strategies for controlling mosquito populations. In SIT, male mosquitoes are sterilized through radiation and released into the wild, where they compete with wild males to mate with females, leading to a decline in the mosquito population due to infertile eggs. Recent advances include the integration of genetic engineering, such as the Release of Insects carrying Dominant Lethal genes (RIDL), which has been shown to be highly species-specific, cost-effective, and environmentally safe (Wilke et al., 2009; Burt, 2014). This method is particularly promising for targeting Aedes aegypti populations, which are vectors of diseases such as dengue and Zika (Zheng et al., 2019).

6.2 Biological control methods (e.g., Wolbachia-Based Approaches)

Biological control methods, such as the use of Wolbachia bacteria, have shown promise in reducing the transmission of mosquito-borne diseases. Wolbachia, a naturally occurring symbiotic bacterium, can reduce the ability of mosquitoes to transmit pathogens by blocking virus replication within the mosquito. Several field trials, including in Aedes albopictus, have demonstrated that the release of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes can suppress mosquito populations and reduce the incidence of diseases like dengue and Zika (Mains et al., 2016; Yen and Failloux, 2020). Wolbachia-based approaches are considered environmentally friendly, as they do not involve chemicals and can be combined with SIT for enhanced population suppression (Zhang et al., 2015).

6.3 Chemical and environmental interventions

Chemical and environmental interventions remain key strategies for mosquito control, though they are facing challenges such as resistance and environmental concerns. Insecticides like pyrethroids are commonly used in indoor residual spraying and bed nets but have led to widespread resistance in mosquito populations (Wang and Lin, 2024). Environmental management, such as the elimination of mosquito breeding sites and the use of biological agents like bacterial pesticides, has shown promise in reducing mosquito populations without the harmful side effects of traditional chemical methods (Raghavendra et al., 2011). Integrating chemical and biological approaches, alongside novel genetic technologies, could offer more sustainable control strategies in the future.

7 Case Study

7.1 Overview of the selected region or situation

This case study focuses on the transmission dynamics of dengue in Miami, USA. Miami has experienced multiple dengue outbreaks in recent years due to its warm, subtropical climate and large population of Aedes aegypti, the primary mosquito vector for the disease. The proximity of Miami to dengue-endemic regions and the frequent travel of people between these regions has resulted in several introductions of the virus, posing a persistent public health threat (Robert et al., 2016).

7.2 Analysis of specific pathogen-mosquito transmission dynamics

Dengue transmission in Miami is influenced by several factors, including the local mosquito population density, human movement patterns, and the seasonal climate variations that affect mosquito activity. Research has shown that the timing and location of introduced dengue cases significantly impact the probability of local transmission. In Miami, the presence of a large, susceptible mosquito population combined with frequent introductions of the virus creates ideal conditions for the spread of dengue, especially during the rainy season when mosquito populations peak. Models have also indicated that even small outbreaks can go undetected due to the low rate of clinical presentation in some cases, complicating mitigation efforts (Robert et al., 2016).

7.3 Lessons learned and implications for future research

One of the key lessons from the Miami dengue outbreaks is the importance of continuous vector surveillance and the need for proactive public health interventions, especially in regions with seasonal fluctuations in mosquito populations. The case study highlights the utility of mathematical models in predicting potential outbreak scenarios and guiding control strategies. Future research should focus on improving the accuracy of these models by incorporating more granular data on mosquito population dynamics and human movement patterns. Additionally, ongoing efforts to develop genetic and biological control methods, such as the release of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes, should be integrated into the overall strategy to combat dengue and other mosquito-borne diseases in Miami and similar urban areas (Robert et al., 2016).

8 Future Directions and Emerging Trends

8.1 Advances in molecular and genomic tools

Advances in molecular biology and genomics have significantly improved our understanding of mosquito-pathogen interactions. Techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 allow researchers to manipulate mosquito genomes, creating genetically modified mosquitoes that are resistant to diseases such as malaria and dengue. RNA interference (RNAi) and next-generation sequencing have further enabled detailed studies of mosquito immune responses and pathogen transmission mechanisms. These tools offer promising avenues for the development of new interventions to disrupt the transmission of mosquito-borne pathogens.

8.2 Novel strategies for disrupting transmission

Novel strategies targeting pathogen-mosquito interactions are gaining momentum. One promising approach involves the use of Wolbachia bacteria to block virus transmission. Field trials have demonstrated that releasing Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes can suppress populations and reduce disease transmission rates for viruses like dengue and Zika (Yen and Failloux, 2020). Additionally, the development of genetically modified mosquitoes, such as those carrying self-limiting or gene drive systems, could further reduce vector populations or alter vector competence for disease transmission (Burt, 2014).

8.3 Policy and global health perspectives

Global health policy must adapt to emerging trends in mosquito-borne disease control. Integrating novel molecular tools and ecological approaches into vector control programs requires regulatory frameworks that prioritize safety and efficacy. Policy changes should focus on global collaborations to monitor and control mosquito populations, particularly in regions vulnerable to outbreaks due to climate change. Strengthening public health systems and ensuring equitable access to innovations in vector control are also critical for reducing the global burden of mosquito-borne diseases.

9 Concluding Remarks

This study has explored the intricate dynamics between mosquitoes and the pathogens they transmit, highlighting several key insights into the molecular, environmental, and genetic factors that govern these interactions. Advances in understanding mosquito-pathogen molecular interactions, such as how mosquitoes' immune responses and microbiota shape pathogen development, have been instrumental in shedding light on transmission mechanisms. Environmental factors, especially climate change, play a critical role in the geographical spread of mosquito-borne diseases, with rising temperatures facilitating the expansion of mosquito populations into new areas. Moreover, genetic variability within mosquito populations and pathogens influences transmission efficiency and adaptability. The study of mosquito microbiota, particularly symbionts like Wolbachia, has provided new avenues for biological control strategies, potentially revolutionizing disease control by disrupting pathogen transmission.

Looking ahead, it is essential to integrate molecular tools like CRISPR and RNA interference with field studies to develop more targeted control strategies. In addition, sustainable vector control programs should combine innovative approaches-such as genetically modified mosquitoes and Wolbachia-based methods-with traditional control techniques like habitat modification and the use of insecticides. Global coordination and well-structured policy frameworks will be essential to ensure the successful deployment of these interventions. Collaboration across borders, especially in regions vulnerable to climate change, will help mitigate the increasing risk of outbreaks.

The future of pathogen-mosquito interaction research holds immense promise, driven by the development of cutting-edge technologies such as gene drives and synthetic biology. These innovations offer the potential to suppress mosquito populations and disrupt transmission cycles more effectively than ever before. However, ethical considerations and the long-term ecological impacts of these technologies must be carefully assessed. With continued research and interdisciplinary collaboration, alongside thoughtful implementation of integrated control strategies, there is optimism that the global burden of mosquito-borne diseases can be significantly reduced.

Acknowledgment

I sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions on this study.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The author affirms that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Alonso-Palomares L., Moreno-García M., Lanz-Mendoza H., and Salazar M.I., 2019, Molecular basis for arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, Intervirology, 61(5): 255-264.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000499128

Altinli M., Schnettler E., and Sicard M., 2021, Symbiotic interactions between mosquitoes and mosquito viruses, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 11: 694020.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.694020

Bhowmik B., Saha S.K., Pramanik M., Mondal S., and Roy P., 2023, Impact of mosquito gut microbiota on propagating pathogenic infections, Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology, 2023: 76-89.

https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2023/v44i53446

Boissière A., Tchioffo M., Bachar D., Abate L., Marie A., Nsango S.E., Shahbazkia H.R., Awono-Ambene P.H., Levashina E.A., Christen R., and Morlais I., 2012, Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection, PLoS Pathogens, 8(5): e1002742.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002742

Burt A., 2014, Heritable strategies for controlling insect vectors of disease, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1645): 20130432.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0432

Chandler J.A., Liu R.M., and Bennett S., 2015, RNA shotgun metagenomic sequencing of northern California mosquitoes uncovers viruses, bacteria, and fungi, Frontiers in Microbiology, 6: 185.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00185

Ciota A.T., and Kramer L.D., 2013, Vector-virus interactions and transmission dynamics of West Nile virus, Viruses, 5: 3021-3047.

https://doi.org/10.3390/v5123021

Cirimotich C., Ramírez J., and Dimopoulos G., 2011, Native microbiota shape insect vector competence for human pathogens, Cell Host and Microbe, 10(4): 307-310.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.006

Couper L.I., Farner J.E., Caldwell J., Childs M., Harris M., Kirk D., Nova N., Shocket M., Skinner E., Uricchio L.H., Expósito-Alonso M., and Mordecai E., 2021, How will mosquitoes adapt to climate warming? eLife, 10: e69630.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69630

Duguma D., Hall M., Smartt C., and Neufeld J., 2017, Effects of organic amendments on microbiota associated with the Culex nigripalpus mosquito vector of the Saint Louis encephalitis and West Nile viruses, mSphere, 2(1): e00387-16.

https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00387-16

Elbers A., Koenraadt C., and Meiswinkel R., 2015, Mosquitoes and Culicoides biting midges: Vector range and the influence of climate change, Revue Scientifique Et Technique, 34(1): 123-37.

https://doi.org/10.20506/RST.34.1.2349

Ferreira P., Tesla B., Horacio E.C. A., Nahum L., Brindley M., Mendes T.A.O., and Murdock C., 2020, Temperature dramatically shapes mosquito gene expression with consequences for mosquito-Zika virus interactions, Frontiers in Microbiology, 11: 901.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00901

Fu G.L., 2024, Resistance mechanisms to Bt toxins in insect populations, Bt Research, 15(4): 193-203.

https://doi.org/10.5376/bt.2024.15.0019

Gao H., Cui C., Wang L., Jacobs-Lorena M., and Wang S., 2019, Mosquito microbiota and implications for disease control, Trends in Parasitology, 36(2): 98-111.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.001

Hegde S., Rasgon J.L., and Hughes G.L., 2015, The microbiome modulates arbovirus transmission in mosquitoes, Current Opinion in Virology, 15: 97-102.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2015.08.011

Heu K., and Gendrin M., 2018, Mosquito microbiota and its influence on disease vectorial transmission, Biologie Aujourd'hui, 212(3-4): 119-136.

https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2019003

Hoyos J., Carrasquilla M.C., León C., Montgomery J., Salyer S., Komar N., and González C., 2021, Host selection pattern and flavivirus screening of mosquitoes in a disturbed Colombian rainforest, Scientific Reports, 11(1): 18656.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98076-8

Mains J.W., Brelsfoard C., Rose R., and Dobson S., 2016, Female adult Aedes albopictus suppression by Wolbachia-infected male mosquitoes, Scientific Reports, 6(1): 33846.

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33846

Merwaiss F., Filomatori C.V., Susuki Y., Bardossy E.S., Alvarez D., and Saleh M., 2020, Chikungunya virus replication rate determines the capacity of crossing tissue barriers in mosquitoes, Journal of Virology, 95(3): 10-1128.

https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01956-20

Minard G., Tran F., Van V.T., Goubert C., Bellet C., Lambert G., Kim T., Thủy T., Mavingui P., and Valiente Moro C., 2015, French invasive Asian tiger mosquito populations harbor reduced bacterial microbiota and genetic diversity compared to Vietnamese autochthonous relatives, Frontiers in Microbiology, 6: 970.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00970

Nagaki S.S., Chaves L., López R.M., Bergo E., Laporta G., Conn J., and Sallum M., 2020, Host feeding patterns of Nyssorhynchus darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Brazilian Amazon, Acta Tropica, 213: 105751.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105751

Raghavendra K., Barik T.K., Reddy B.P., Sharma P., and Dash A.P., 2011, Malaria vector control: from past to future, Parasitology Research, 108: 757-779.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2232-0

Robert M., Christofferson R., Silva N.J.B., Vasquez C., Mores C., and Wearing H., 2016, Modeling mosquito-borne disease spread in U.S. urbanized areas: the case of dengue in Miami, PLoS One, 11(8): e0161365.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161365

Ruiz-López M., 2020, Mosquito behavior and vertebrate microbiota interaction: implications for pathogen transmission, Frontiers in Microbiology, 11: 573371.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.573371

Simões M.L., Caragata E.P., and Dimopoulos G., 2018, Diverse host and restriction factors regulate mosquito-pathogen interactions, Trends in Parasitology, 34(7): 603-616.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2018.04.011

Smith D.L., Perkins T.A., Reiner R.C., Barker C.M., Niu T., Chaves L.F., Ellis A.M., George D.B., Le Menach A., Pulliam J.R.C., Bisanzio D., Buckee C.O., Chiyaka C., Cummings D.A.T., Garcia A.J., Gatton M.L., Gething P.W., Hartley D.M., Johnston G., Klein E.Y., Michael E., Lloyd A.L., Pigott D.M., Reisen W.K., Ruktanonchai N.W., Singh B.K., Stoller J., Tatem A.J., Kitron U., Godfray H.C.J., Cohen J.M., and Hay S.I., 2014, Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 108: 185-197.

https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru026

Suesdek L., 2019, Microevolution of medically important mosquitoes - a review, Acta Tropica, 191: 162-171.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.12.013

Tokash-Peters A.G., Jabon J.D., Fung M.E., Peters J.A., Lopez S., and Woodhams D., 2022, Trans-generational symbiont transmission reduced at high temperatures in a West Nile virus vector mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, Frontiers in Tropical Diseases, 3: 762132.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2022.762132

Wang Z.L., and Lin X.F., 2024, Long-term impact of feline calicivirus (FCV): from transmission dynamics to disease management, International Journal of Molecular Veterinary Research, 14(1): 17-22.

https://doi.org/10.5376/ijmvr.2024.14.0003

Wilke A., Gomes A.C., Natal D., and Marrelli M.T., 2009, Control of vector populations using genetically modified mosquitoes, Revista de Saude Publica, 43: 869-874.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000050

Yan J., Gangoso L., Ruíz S., Soriguer R., Figuerola J., and Martínez‐de la Puente J., 2021, Understanding host utilization by mosquitoes: determinants, challenges, and future directions, Biological Reviews, 96(4): 1367-1385.

https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12706

Yeh K.B., Fair J.M., Smith W., Martinez Torres T., Lucas J., Monagin C., Winegar R., and Fletcher J., 2020, Assessing climate change impact on ecosystems and infectious disease: important roles for genomic sequencing and a one health perspective, Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 5(2): 90.

https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5020090

Yen P.S., and Failloux A.B., 2020, A review: wolbachia-based population replacement for mosquito control shares common points with genetically modified control approaches, Pathogens, 9(5): 404.

https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050404

Zhang D., Lees R.S., Xi Z., Gilles J.R.L., and Bourtzis K., 2015, Combining the sterile insect technique with Wolbachia-based approaches: II-A safer approach to Aedes albopictus population suppression programs, PLoS One, 10(8): e0135194.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135194

Zheng B., Tang M., Yu J., and Qiu J., 2018, Wolbachia spreading dynamics in mosquitoes with imperfect maternal transmission, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 76: 235-263.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1142-5

Zheng X., Zhang D., Li Y., Yang C., Wu Y., Liang X., and Xi Z., 2019, Incompatible and sterile insect techniques combined eliminate mosquitoes, Nature, 572: 56-61.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1407-9